What question would you most like answered?

How is it possible, given the fact that the human psyche is tuned up to recall/retain a mere seven-plus-or-minus-two facts, or perhaps embeds in a sentence, such as the one you are currently reading, although Aurobindo or Hegel or Lacan make this here postmodern self-referential endeavour of mine look like a kintergarden scrawl in terms of sentence construction,  and Gerald Manley Hopkins did the same thing in poetry only it is seen to be a literary device for which he is lauded; a fertile coiled spring ready to sproinnng through the relief offered at the end/resolution in the final release from the parenthetical embeddings, a device used in teutonic music from Bach to Wagner and lacking in the derepressed pastoral tones of a Debussy, much to the chagrin of lovers of a dynamist like Von Karajan or Bernstein, although this sentence is less coiled and now more torturous as you have now here reached the core of inner embedded parentheses which we will now leave like newlyapprehending left-bulging brackets in a cyber-hug cypher, although I adore the dulcet French Impressionistic tones, and Bach's geometrical sonic mandalas turn me on also, the minor-key climaxes like lovers-beads timingly released from the anus, notwithstanding the purple edges of the Life Divine or Ecrits, although you may have given up now, and they may also be occupatio-style reasonnings, and maybe we can retain/recall more, that we, or perhaps I, should want to concoct such a waste of your time in the first place?